Republican Establishment: Anyone but Paul

December 18, 2011 § Leave a comment

If it came down to it, the Republican establishment would rather have four more years of Obama if the only alternative was a Ron Paul presidency.

At least, that’s the image that they seem to be presenting.

Fox News analyst Chris Wallace recently claimed that a Ron Paul victory in Iowa would “discredit” the caucus in that state. Of course, if Michelle Bachmann were to somehow pull off the upset, Wallace would be one of the first to dub that lunatic as a potential frontrunner.

Let’s be honest here, Wallace and the rest of the characters at Fox News(Napolitano being a notable exception) have a vested interest in suppressing Ron Paul’s ideas. Mainly, his views on foreign policy are a direct threat to the Republican establishment that media outlets like Fox News do their damnedest to defend. At the risk of sounding what seems to have become a cliche complaint, the neoconservatives have invaded the party and it’s major media outlets. Fox News, The National Review, and the anti-intellectual henchmen of the American Right; Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity, have all become either influenced by or entirely a part of the neocon movement.

The neoconservatives and the Republican party more generally, really could give two shits about issues like the Federal Reserve or civil liberties, and they sure as hell want nothing to do with a candidate who holds anti-war positions. At the most, you will see candidates like Rick Perry and Newt Romney pay lip service to these ideas, but they certainly haven’t been talking about this publicly since the 1970’s.

From what I can tell, the GOP is giving up long term success in the name of short term appeasement. Rather than tapping into the obvious intellectual and popular shift towards libertarianism and the principles of the Old Right, the party is clinging to a dying breed of “conservatism” that can not and will not stand the test of time. As the word appeasement suggests, this has little to do with any kind of thoughtful strategy, and a lot to do with the inability of the party to separate itself from the interests that have more or less guided it since the aftermath of September 11th. Granted, it’s unlikely that the party could ever fully gain the support of the growing libertarian movement among American’s aged 18-35. Unlike the evangelicals that have been successfully swindled by sly Republican politicians time and time again, the “Paulian” wing of the American right wing is likely too principled to vote for a “party” rather than a candidate. In fact, it would be surprising to see even a small number of the Paulians continue to vote for the Republicans in the decades to come. That is, unless the party can embrace the type of politician that Ron Paul very well emulates(ahem….Justin Amash). Indeed, Krauthhammer couldn’t be more wrong when he claims that Paulians will eventually “grow up and become conservatives“. Of course, we’re used to Krauthammer making remarks like this. As one of the most prominent members of the neoconservative movement, it’s his duty to make dishonest remarks in an effort to comfort the 50&over Fox News viewers as well as the evangelical Zionists who are frightened by Ron Paul’s bold stances.

I’m not convinced that Ron Paul can win the nomination, but a Ron Paul victory in Iowa would in no way “discredit” the caucus. To the contrary, it would be the first major indication that the American Right is getting back to it’s roots and rejecting the blatant statist nature of the Republican party in it’s current form.

Or to put it in a way that my neoconservative brethren might better appreciate; a Ron Paul victory in Iowa would indicate an increasing number of Americans have broken their chains and discovered that the shadows on the cave wall are nothing more than a shell of the true reality.

Here’s to hoping that the Republican party drowns in it’s own stubborn nature, and that Ron Paul continues to revive the libertarian movement in a way never seen before.

I’ll have to check back in 30 years and see if I’ve matured into a conservative, as Krauthammer suggests will happen. Anything is possible, but I’m quite confident I’ll never be the type of “conservative” that Krauthammer and his ilk pretend to emulate. And thank goodness for that.

Advertisements

One Nation, Indoctrinated

December 15, 2011 § Leave a comment

Just as the Bush years exposed a large portion of the American right for the party hacks that they are, the Obama presidency seems to be unveiling the ugly, partisan nature of the American left. It’s becoming increasingly popular for Americans to consider themselves “independent” or just plain apathetic. In other words, the luster of latching onto a party has worn off. Granted, this has been a slow process that spanned much of the twentieth century, but seems to have sped up recently.

Although apathy is perhaps a dangerous way to approach the political world, no one can be blamed for simply ignoring the barrage of statist and contradictory legislation that passes through DC. Indeed, it’s better to be ignorant yet indifferent, rather than boisterously wrong. I think I’m paraphrasing Rothbard here, but I’m too lazy to look up the exact quote.

The large majority of rhetoric and discussion amongst the DC politicians and their counterparts in the media can be described best as “boisterously wrong.” Both the left and the right, the Dem’s and the Repub’s, are dead wrong on many issues. Which would be okay, if they weren’t so loud about it. And to exasperate the problem, it’s precisely the words of these politicians and commentators which so strongly affect what the average American will discuss over the water cooler the next morning. Then again, it’s not easy to be both honest and succesful in Washington. After all, someone has take advantage of the numerous lobbyists lining the halls of the capital building(isn’t that right, Newt?).

When you get down to it, it’s the narrow spectrum of thought that is allowed by the mainstream media which distorts the thoughts of otherwise rational everyday Americans. Someone who is extremely intelligent in just about every facet of life can hold some extremely stupid political views. This is most likely the reason that I’m forced to explain to a Chemical Engineer that we weren’t attacked on September eleventh because of our freedoms. Besides, as I usually would say, if they hate us for our freedoms, wouldn’t legislation like the Patriot Act amount to letting them win(whatever the hell that means)? Such obvious contradictions should be obvious to any intelligent human, but because the dialogue in this country is so restricted, common sense is sometimes lost on average Americans.

This is where the internet comes in. And this also gives a good explanation as to why there seems to be such a gap in ideas between generations. The 50&over crowd primarily gets it’s information from Pravda— err, the national evening news. CBS, ABC, NBC, and FOX all report essentially the same garbage. There’s a reason my parents had never heard Ron Paul mentioned on the television up until this month. Meanwhile, I’ve spent the past few years investigating the man, his influences, and reading just about every book he suggested. Let’s put it this way; I haven’t paid for cable in three years; my dad doesn’t know how to turn a computer on. You do the math.

The essential difference between my parents and myself, of course, has everything to do with the form of media we use. My parents get home from work, eat dinner, and listen to Brian Williams as he spoon feeds them whatever bits of news his superiors felt acceptable for public consumption.

Meanwhile, I get home from school/an internship and check out Google News, Youtube, LewRockwell, Mises.org, etc, etc. The difference between these media outlets and their dinosaur, mainstream counterparts is twofold:

1) Online media is a two way street. Not only can the Wall Street Journal and MSNBC post a new story or a video, but any average joe or independent news source can buy a domain or open up a YouTube account and immediately start dishing out their own material.

2) This prevents any type of “monopoly” or “oligopoly” from forming as it has on television(Not to worry, big brother is working on that as we speak).

It’s going to be very interesting to see how all of this works out as the younger generation become tax cattle–err, working adults, and eventually the majority in society.

Of course, as I hinted at earlier, the state is already trying to wrap it’s paws around the internet and strangle it before it does enough damage(is it too late?). Their latest attempt was SOPA, or the “Stop Online Piracy Act”. The outrage of Americans across the US was an encouraging sign that society may fight to hold on to the last shred of freedom we have left. Then again, when US congressmen essentially argue in favor of Chinese style censorship, it’s hard to say that any amount of public discontent will change the fact that 98% of Congress is incredibly detached from the American people(shoutout to Justin Amash and Ron Paul).

At any rate, I feel blessed to be living in an age where the truth is only a few clicks away. Whether this is a lifelong convenience or a historical flash in the pan, only time will tell. Either way, it’s done enough damage to my thoughts over the past few years. 😉 I’ll never be able to trust authority. 🙂

P.S.

My co-op ends after Christmas. Then it’s time to visit family and pretend like I’m enjoying myself. Once the holidays are over, it’s back to the grind! I have a decently beefy schedule, so I will have to use the weekend to catch up on the news as well as update this blog.

Thanks for reading. 😉

A new post soon

December 13, 2011 § Leave a comment

I will be making a new post soon.

I know, the suspense is just killing you.

Where Am I?

You are currently viewing the archives for December, 2011 at The Liberty Minded Individual.